Let’s speak plainly—Mt. Kenya is not a village mob to be herded in anger every time a politician feels wounded. We are a proud, progressive, and politically mature region. So we must ask: where exactly is Rigathi Gachagua leading us?
For months now, Gachagua has painted himself as the voice of the mountain. He’s loud, emotional, and relentless—but does noise equal direction? No. What we’re seeing is a man fighting for political survival, not community empowerment.
And here’s the truth many won’t say aloud: if Gachagua were still Deputy President today, seated comfortably in power, he would be the first one defending this government. He would be on national TV every day telling us how well Ruto is performing. The same government he now calls oppressive is the one he campaigned for, stood by, and fiercely protected. So what changed? Not policy—only his position.
Let’s not forget, this is the same leader who has struggled to gain acceptance beyond his tribal base. His style of politics is combative, often divisive, and rarely inclusive. He has not united the country, and increasingly, he risks dividing even this region.
And while he now claims to be the chief defender of Mt. Kenya interests, no one should claim to be more “Wantam” than the rest of us. Some of us didn’t vote for Ruto but still chose to support the government for the sake of development, peace and progress. That’s real maturity.
Yes, we acknowledge that Gachagua has been vocal. But let’s not confuse volume for vision. Mt. Kenya must not be dragged into personal wars disguised as community interest.
Our destiny is too important to gamble on bitterness. Let’s walk in truth, not blind loyalty. The mountain must rise, but with clarity—not confusion.
