A fiery statement by Nakuru Governor Susan Kihika has reignited long-running allegations that former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua used his political office to intimidate and extort businessmen—claims she says are now being replicated within his new Democracy for the Citizens Party (DCP).
In a strongly worded message that has since circulated widely, Kihika accused Gachagua of attempting to blackmail her spouse and other Mt Kenya businessmen for what she described as “protection fees” during his tenure as Deputy President. According to Kihika, her spouse declined to cooperate with the alleged demands, including being pressured into business dealings involving Gachagua’s family and proposed sugar importation ventures.
Kihika’s statement paints a picture of a leader who, she claims, weaponized political power to coerce wealthy individuals into compliance. She suggests that refusal was often met with intimidation, public attacks, or political harassment. While Gachagua has not publicly responded to the specific allegations, the claims echo complaints previously whispered within business circles but rarely stated openly.
More controversially, Kihika argues that this behavior did not end with Gachagua’s exit from office. She alleges that similar pressure tactics are now being used within the DCP, particularly targeting businessmen and political aspirants, who she claims are being “forced” to part with money to gain favor or protection within the party.
Her remarks followed Gachagua’s recent tour of Kinamba, Naivasha, where she claims much of his speech focused on personal attacks rather than policy proposals. Kihika questioned what she described as his obsession with critics and suggested it reflected political insecurity, especially in light of his impeachment challenges.
While these allegations remain unproven and firmly contested territory, Kihika’s public call-out has shifted the conversation from private grumbling to national scrutiny. It raises uncomfortable questions about political financing, abuse of power, and whether Kenya’s business community is still vulnerable to coercion—regardless of whether leaders hold public office or operate through political parties.
