If Rigathi Gachagua had not been impeached, let’s be honest — he would still be in government today, shouting the loudest in support of President William Ruto.
He would be defending every government policy, from the Affordable Housing Levy to the new taxes, calling them “visionary” ideas. He would be reminding Kenyans that those who didn’t vote for Ruto are “non-shareholders,” and mocking the opposition for “wasting time.” That’s the Gachagua we knew — loyal when it suits him, rebellious when it doesn’t.
Let’s not forget, this is the same man who once declared that he was Ruto’s “mtu wa mkono” and even claimed that Mt. Kenya’s only political direction was through him. His tone only changed after his impeachment. Suddenly, he discovered injustice, fairness, and unity. But where were those values when he wielded power?
The truth is, Gachagua thrives in proximity to power. His politics are not about principle; they are about survival. If he were still Deputy President, he would be the chief defender of government programs — hosting press conferences to praise Ruto’s leadership, warning critics to “respect the presidency,” and claiming that all is well in Kenya Kwanza.
His rebellion only began after losing access to state power, resources, and attention. Now, he is painting himself as a victim — the man who stood up to Ruto. But his history tells a different story: a politician who changes sides when convenient.
If Gachagua had not been impeached, he wouldn’t have resigned. He would still be holding a Bible in one hand and reading Ruto’s talking points with the other. His loyalty was never to the people — it was always to power. That’s the uncomfortable truth about Gachagua’s politics
